next up previous contents index
Next: Elastic scattering cross sections Up: Simulation of electron transport Previous: Two Photon Positron-Electron Annihilation   Contents   Index


Collision stopping power

EGSnrc ``inherits'' the treatment of restricted collision stopping powers from EGS4, i.e. uses the formulas recommended by Seltzer and Berger [61] which are based on the Bethe-Bloch theory [62,63,64]. The standard treatment (see also ICRU report 37 [50] which was used as the source of the formulas below) assumes that there is a certain value for energy transfer to atomic electrons, $ T_{\rm med}$, that is (i) large compared to the binding energies (ii) corresponds to an impact parameter that is large compared to the atomic dimensions. Collision processes that are associated with energy loss $ T'$ less than $ T_{\rm med}$ are treated according to the theory of Bethe, the main result of which is that

$\displaystyle L_{\rm coll}^\pm(T,T' < T_{\rm med}) = {2 \pi r_0^2 m n \over \be...
... \beta^2 T_{\rm med} \over (1 - \beta^2) I^2 \right) - \beta^2 - \delta \right]$ (4.6.1)

where $ \beta$ is again the electron velocity in units of the speed of light, $ I$ is the mean ionization energy and $ \delta$ the density effect correction that takes into account the polarization of the medium due to the electron field. As $ T_{\rm med}$ is defined being large compared to the binding energies of the atom, collision processes with energy transfer larger than $ T_{\rm med}$ can be treated using the Møller [53] (electrons) or Bhabha [54] (positron) cross section (see also section 2.4.3), i.e.

$\displaystyle L_{\rm coll}^\pm(T,T' > T_{\rm med}) = \int\limits_{T_{\rm med}}^{T_c} {\rm d}T' T' {{\rm d} \sigma_{\rm inel}^\pm \over {\rm d}T'}$ (4.6.2)

Using some additional approximations, $ T_{\rm med}$ drops out in the sum of $ L_{\rm coll}^\pm(E,T' < T_{\rm med})$ and $ L_{\rm coll}^\pm(E,T' > T_{\rm med})$ and one obtains

$\displaystyle L_{\rm coll}^\pm(T,T_c) = {2 \pi r_0^2 m n \over \beta^2} \left[ \ln {T^2 \over I^2} + \ln(1 + \tau/2) + G^\pm(\tau) - \delta \right]$ (4.6.3)

where $ \tau = T/m$ and the functions $ G^\pm$ are different for electrons and positrons due differences in the Møller and Bhabha cross sections and are given by

\begin{displaymath}\begin{split}G^-(\tau) & = -1 - \beta^2 + \ln\left[ \eta (1 -...
...ver 3} \eta^3 - {y^3 \tau^3 \over 4} \eta^4 \right] \end{split}\end{displaymath} (4.6.4)

where $ \eta = T_c/T$ and $ y$ is defined in Eq. (4.3.10).

From the above discussion and from the general discussion of a Class II condensed history implementation in section 2.4.1 it is clear that the formalism used to treat inelastic collisions with atomic electrons is only applicable if

$\displaystyle T_c \gg ~~$binding energies of the medium of interest$\displaystyle .$ (4.6.5)

This imposes a rather severe limitation on the use of Class II condensed history codes in high-$ Z$ materials (the $ K$-shell binding energy for lead is, for instance, 88 keV). We are therefore currently investigating a more realistic approach for situations when the condition (4.6.5) is not satisfied, but its implementation into EGSnrc is left for the next release of the system. One should probably also mention that the many successful studies carried out with the EGS4 system indicate that the implications of violating the requirement (4.6.5) are perhaps less severe than one might expect from purely theoretical arguments.

The only non-trivial parameters of the restricted stopping power formula are the mean ionization energy $ I$ and the density effect correction $ \delta$. The default mean ionization energies for elements used in PEGS4, along with atomic numbers, weights, chemical symbols, and mass densities are summarized in Table 2. Mean ionization energies for compounds are derived from

$\displaystyle \ln I = \sum p_i Z_i \ln I(Z_i)$ (4.6.6)

where $ p_i$ is the stoichiometric index of the $ i$'th element which has atomic number $ Z_i$ and a mean ionization energy $ I(Z_i)$, unless the material belongs to a set of pre-defined materials to be found in Table 2.13.2 of the EGS4 manual [12] or listed in the BLOCK DATA section of pegs4.mortran.

The density effects correction has been treated extensively in the literature. The default PEGS4 approach is based on the formulation of Sternheimer and Peierls[65] which basically parameterizes the density effect in terms of 6 parameters (AFACT, SK, X0, X1, CBAR, and IEV). This same parameterized approach was used for the calculations by Berger and Seltzer [66] and by Sternheimer, Berger and Seltzer [67] who fitted the parameters to the density effect as calculated for the ICRU for increasingly larger numbers of materials. The power of PEGS4 is that it will generate a density effect for any arbitrary material, if need be with no recourse to the fitted parameters. In this case it will use the Sternheimer and Peierls[65] general formula. There is also an option in PEGS4 which allows the 6 parameters to be read in directly (using the ISSB=1 option in PEGS4, see section 6.2 page [*]). However, these parameterizations are only fits to the actual density effect data. An option was added to PEGS4 in 1989 which allowed the density effect data to be used directly[68] and the EGSnrc distribution includes a huge data base of all the density effect values calculated by Seltzer and Berger for ICRU Report 37[50]. To turn this option on the user must set the flag EPSTFL to 1 in the PEGS4 input file. See section 6.1.2 (page [*]) for more details. In this case the density effect correction is calculated by interpolation from pre-computed values stored in a separate file. Selecting this option has the additional effect that the mean ionization energy of the material is taken directly from the density effect correction file. It should be noted that in general the differences in collision stopping powers between using the default Sternheimer and Peierls density effect, or the fitted parameters or the direct ICRU 37 values, are small, of the order of a few percent at most. These differences are only likely of importance for very detailed work.

Table 2: Default atomic numbers, symbols, atomic weights, mass densities, and I values for elements in PEGS4.
Z Symbol Atomic Density I(eV)
    weight (g/cm$ ^3$)  
         
1 H 1.00797 0.0808 19.2
2 HE 4.00260 0.1900 41.8
3 LI 6.93900 0.5340 40.0
4 BE 9.01220 1.8500 63.7
5 B 10.81100 2.5000 76.0
6 C 12.01115 2.2600 78.0
7 N 14.00670 1.1400 82.0
8 O 15.99940 1.5680 95.0
9 F 18.99840 1.5000 115.0
10 NE 20.18300 1.0000 137.0
11 NA 22.98980 0.9712 149.0
12 MG 24.31200 1.7400 156.0
13 AL 26.98150 2.7020 166.0
14 SI 28.08800 2.4000 173.0
15 P 30.97380 1.8200 173.0
16 S 32.06400 2.0700 180.0
17 CL 35.45300 2.2000 174.0
18 AR 39.94800 1.6500 188.0
19 K 39.10200 0.8600 190.0
20 CA 40.08000 1.5500 191.0
21 SC 44.95600 3.0200 216.0
22 TI 47.90000 4.5400 233.0
23 V 50.94200 5.8700 245.0
24 CR 51.99800 7.1400 257.0
25 MN 54.93800 7.3000 272.0
26 FE 55.84700 7.8600 286.0
27 CO 58.93320 8.7100 297.0
28 NI 58.71000 8.9000 311.0
29 CU 63.54000 8.9333 322.0
30 ZN 65.37000 7.1400 330.0
31 GA 69.72000 5.9100 334.0
32 GE 72.59000 5.3600 350.0
33 AS 74.92160 5.7300 347.0
34 SE 78.96000 4.8000 348.0
35 BR 79.80800 4.2000 357.0
36 KR 83.80000 3.4000 352.0
37 RB 85.47000 1.5300 363.0
38 SR 87.62000 2.6000 366.0
39 Y 88.90500 4.4700 379.0
40 ZR 91.22000 6.4000 393.0
41 NB 92.90600 8.5700 417.0
42 MO 95.94000 9.0100 424.0
43 TC 99.00000 11.5000 428.0
44 RU 101.07000 12.2000 441.0
45 RH 102.90500 12.5000 449.0
46 PD 106.40000 12.0000 470.0
47 AG 107.87000 10.5000 470.0
48 CD 112.40000 8.6500 469.0
49 IN 114.82000 7.3000 488.0
50 SN 118.69000 7.3100 488.0
51 SB 121.75000 6.6840 487.0
52 TE 127.60000 6.2400 485.0
53 I 126.90440 4.9300 491.0
54 XE 131.30000 2.7000 482.0
55 CS 132.90500 1.8730 488.0
56 BA 137.34000 3.5000 491.0
57 LA 138.91000 6.1500 501.0
58 CE 140.12000 6.9000 523.0
59 PR 140.90700 6.7690 535.0
60 ND 144.24001 7.0070 546.0
61 PM 147.00000 1.0000 560.0
62 SM 150.35001 7.5400 574.0
63 EU 151.98000 5.1700 580.0
64 GD 157.25000 7.8700 591.0
65 TB 158.92400 8.2500 614.0
66 DY 162.50000 8.5600 628.0
67 HO 164.92999 8.8000 650.0
68 ER 167.25999 9.0600 658.0
69 TM 168.93401 9.3200 674.0
70 YB 173.03999 6.9600 684.0
71 LU 174.97000 9.8500 694.0
72 HF 178.49001 11.4000 705.0
73 TA 180.94800 16.6000 718.0
74 W 183.85001 19.3000 727.0
75 RE 186.20000 20.5300 736.0
76 OS 190.20000 22.4800 746.0
77 IR 192.20000 22.4200 757.0
78 PT 195.08000 21.4500 790.0
79 AU 196.98700 19.3000 790.0
80 HG 200.59000 14.1900 800.0
81 TL 204.37000 11.8500 810.0
82 PB 207.19000 11.3400 823.0
83 BI 208.98000 9.7800 823.0
84 PO 210.00000 9.3000 830.0
85 AT 210.00000 1.0000 825.0
86 RN 222.00000 4.0000 794.0
87 FR 223.00000 1.0000 827.0
88 RA 226.00000 5.0000 826.0
89 AC 227.00000 1.0000 841.0
90 TH 232.03600 11.0000 847.0
91 PA 231.00000 15.3700 878.0
92 U 238.03000 18.9000 890.0
93 NP 237.00000 20.5000 902.0
94 PU 242.00000 19.7370 921.0
95 AM 243.00000 11.7000 934.0
96 CM 247.00000 7.0000 939.0
97 BK 247.00000 1.0000 952.0
98 CF 248.00000 1.0000 966.0
99 ES 254.00000 1.0000 980.0
100 FM 253.00000 1.0000 994.0


next up previous contents index
Next: Elastic scattering cross sections Up: Simulation of electron transport Previous: Two Photon Positron-Electron Annihilation   Contents   Index
Iwan Kawrakow 2009-07-10