Next: Elastic scattering cross sections
Up: Simulation of electron transport
Previous: Two Photon Positron-Electron Annihilation
Contents
Index
Collision stopping power
EGSnrc ``inherits'' the treatment of restricted collision
stopping powers from EGS4, i.e. uses the formulas
recommended by Seltzer and Berger [61] which are based
on the Bethe-Bloch theory [62,63,64]. The standard
treatment (see also ICRU report 37 [50] which was
used as the source of the formulas below)
assumes that there is a certain value for energy
transfer to atomic electrons,
, that is (i)
large compared to the binding energies (ii) corresponds to
an impact parameter that is large compared to the atomic
dimensions. Collision processes that are associated with
energy loss
less than
are treated according to
the theory of Bethe, the main result of which is that
![$\displaystyle L_{\rm coll}^\pm(T,T' < T_{\rm med}) = {2 \pi r_0^2 m n \over \be...
... \beta^2 T_{\rm med} \over (1 - \beta^2) I^2 \right) - \beta^2 - \delta \right]$](img617.png) |
(4.6.1) |
where
is again the electron velocity in units of
the speed of light,
is the mean ionization energy and
the density effect correction that takes into
account the polarization of the medium due to the electron field.
As
is defined being large compared to the binding energies of
the atom, collision processes with energy transfer larger
than
can be treated using the Møller [53] (electrons)
or Bhabha [54] (positron) cross section (see also section
2.4.3), i.e.
 |
(4.6.2) |
Using some additional approximations,
drops out
in the sum of
and
and one obtains
![$\displaystyle L_{\rm coll}^\pm(T,T_c) = {2 \pi r_0^2 m n \over \beta^2} \left[ \ln {T^2 \over I^2} + \ln(1 + \tau/2) + G^\pm(\tau) - \delta \right]$](img622.png) |
(4.6.3) |
where
and the functions
are different for
electrons and positrons due differences in the Møller and
Bhabha cross sections and are given by
![\begin{displaymath}\begin{split}G^-(\tau) & = -1 - \beta^2 + \ln\left[ \eta (1 -...
...ver 3} \eta^3 - {y^3 \tau^3 \over 4} \eta^4 \right] \end{split}\end{displaymath}](img624.png) |
(4.6.4) |
where
and
is defined in Eq. (4.3.10).
From the above discussion and from the general discussion
of a Class II condensed history implementation in section
2.4.1 it is clear that the formalism
used to treat inelastic collisions with atomic electrons
is only applicable if
binding energies of the medium of interest |
(4.6.5) |
This imposes a rather severe limitation on the use
of Class II condensed history codes in high-
materials
(the
-shell binding energy for lead is, for instance, 88 keV).
We are therefore currently investigating a more realistic approach for
situations when the condition (4.6.5) is not
satisfied, but its implementation into EGSnrc is left for the
next release of the system. One should probably also mention
that the many successful studies carried out with the
EGS4 system indicate that the implications of violating
the requirement (4.6.5) are perhaps less
severe than one might expect from purely theoretical arguments.
The only non-trivial parameters of the restricted stopping
power formula are the mean ionization energy
and the
density effect correction
. The default mean ionization
energies for elements used in PEGS4, along with atomic numbers,
weights, chemical symbols, and mass densities are summarized
in Table 2. Mean ionization energies for
compounds are derived from
 |
(4.6.6) |
where
is the stoichiometric index of the
'th element
which has atomic number
and a mean ionization energy
,
unless the material belongs to a set of pre-defined materials
to be found in Table 2.13.2 of the EGS4 manual [12] or listed in the
BLOCK DATA section of pegs4.mortran.
The density effects correction
has been treated extensively in the literature.
The default PEGS4 approach is based on the formulation of Sternheimer and
Peierls[65] which basically parameterizes the density effect in
terms of 6 parameters (AFACT, SK, X0, X1, CBAR, and IEV). This same parameterized approach was used for
the calculations by Berger and Seltzer [66] and by
Sternheimer, Berger and Seltzer [67] who fitted the parameters to
the density effect as calculated for the ICRU for increasingly larger
numbers of materials. The power of PEGS4 is that it will generate a
density effect for any arbitrary material, if need be with no recourse to the fitted
parameters. In this case it will use the Sternheimer and
Peierls[65] general formula. There is also an option in PEGS4 which allows the 6
parameters to be read in directly (using the ISSB=1 option in PEGS4,
see section 6.2 page
). However, these
parameterizations are only fits to the actual density effect data. An
option was added to PEGS4 in 1989 which allowed the density effect data
to be used directly[68] and the EGSnrc distribution includes a huge
data base of all the density effect values calculated by Seltzer and Berger
for ICRU Report 37[50].
To turn this option on the user must
set the flag EPSTFL to 1 in the PEGS4 input file. See
section 6.1.2 (page
) for more details.
In this case the density effect correction is calculated
by interpolation from pre-computed values stored in
a separate file.
Selecting this option has the additional effect that the mean
ionization energy of the material is taken directly from
the density effect correction file. It should be noted that in general the
differences in collision stopping powers between using the default Sternheimer
and Peierls density effect, or the fitted parameters or the direct ICRU 37
values, are small, of the order of a few percent at most. These
differences are only
likely of importance for very detailed work.
Table 2:
Default atomic numbers, symbols, atomic weights,
mass densities, and I values for elements in PEGS4.
| Z |
Symbol |
Atomic |
Density |
I(eV) |
| |
|
weight |
(g/cm ) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
H |
1.00797 |
0.0808 |
19.2 |
| 2 |
HE |
4.00260 |
0.1900 |
41.8 |
| 3 |
LI |
6.93900 |
0.5340 |
40.0 |
| 4 |
BE |
9.01220 |
1.8500 |
63.7 |
| 5 |
B |
10.81100 |
2.5000 |
76.0 |
| 6 |
C |
12.01115 |
2.2600 |
78.0 |
| 7 |
N |
14.00670 |
1.1400 |
82.0 |
| 8 |
O |
15.99940 |
1.5680 |
95.0 |
| 9 |
F |
18.99840 |
1.5000 |
115.0 |
| 10 |
NE |
20.18300 |
1.0000 |
137.0 |
| 11 |
NA |
22.98980 |
0.9712 |
149.0 |
| 12 |
MG |
24.31200 |
1.7400 |
156.0 |
| 13 |
AL |
26.98150 |
2.7020 |
166.0 |
| 14 |
SI |
28.08800 |
2.4000 |
173.0 |
| 15 |
P |
30.97380 |
1.8200 |
173.0 |
| 16 |
S |
32.06400 |
2.0700 |
180.0 |
| 17 |
CL |
35.45300 |
2.2000 |
174.0 |
| 18 |
AR |
39.94800 |
1.6500 |
188.0 |
| 19 |
K |
39.10200 |
0.8600 |
190.0 |
| 20 |
CA |
40.08000 |
1.5500 |
191.0 |
| 21 |
SC |
44.95600 |
3.0200 |
216.0 |
| 22 |
TI |
47.90000 |
4.5400 |
233.0 |
| 23 |
V |
50.94200 |
5.8700 |
245.0 |
| 24 |
CR |
51.99800 |
7.1400 |
257.0 |
| 25 |
MN |
54.93800 |
7.3000 |
272.0 |
| 26 |
FE |
55.84700 |
7.8600 |
286.0 |
| 27 |
CO |
58.93320 |
8.7100 |
297.0 |
| 28 |
NI |
58.71000 |
8.9000 |
311.0 |
| 29 |
CU |
63.54000 |
8.9333 |
322.0 |
| 30 |
ZN |
65.37000 |
7.1400 |
330.0 |
| 31 |
GA |
69.72000 |
5.9100 |
334.0 |
| 32 |
GE |
72.59000 |
5.3600 |
350.0 |
| 33 |
AS |
74.92160 |
5.7300 |
347.0 |
| 34 |
SE |
78.96000 |
4.8000 |
348.0 |
| 35 |
BR |
79.80800 |
4.2000 |
357.0 |
| 36 |
KR |
83.80000 |
3.4000 |
352.0 |
| 37 |
RB |
85.47000 |
1.5300 |
363.0 |
| 38 |
SR |
87.62000 |
2.6000 |
366.0 |
| 39 |
Y |
88.90500 |
4.4700 |
379.0 |
| 40 |
ZR |
91.22000 |
6.4000 |
393.0 |
| 41 |
NB |
92.90600 |
8.5700 |
417.0 |
| 42 |
MO |
95.94000 |
9.0100 |
424.0 |
| 43 |
TC |
99.00000 |
11.5000 |
428.0 |
| 44 |
RU |
101.07000 |
12.2000 |
441.0 |
| 45 |
RH |
102.90500 |
12.5000 |
449.0 |
| 46 |
PD |
106.40000 |
12.0000 |
470.0 |
| 47 |
AG |
107.87000 |
10.5000 |
470.0 |
| 48 |
CD |
112.40000 |
8.6500 |
469.0 |
| 49 |
IN |
114.82000 |
7.3000 |
488.0 |
| 50 |
SN |
118.69000 |
7.3100 |
488.0 |
| 51 |
SB |
121.75000 |
6.6840 |
487.0 |
| 52 |
TE |
127.60000 |
6.2400 |
485.0 |
| 53 |
I |
126.90440 |
4.9300 |
491.0 |
| 54 |
XE |
131.30000 |
2.7000 |
482.0 |
| 55 |
CS |
132.90500 |
1.8730 |
488.0 |
| 56 |
BA |
137.34000 |
3.5000 |
491.0 |
| 57 |
LA |
138.91000 |
6.1500 |
501.0 |
| 58 |
CE |
140.12000 |
6.9000 |
523.0 |
| 59 |
PR |
140.90700 |
6.7690 |
535.0 |
| 60 |
ND |
144.24001 |
7.0070 |
546.0 |
| 61 |
PM |
147.00000 |
1.0000 |
560.0 |
| 62 |
SM |
150.35001 |
7.5400 |
574.0 |
| 63 |
EU |
151.98000 |
5.1700 |
580.0 |
| 64 |
GD |
157.25000 |
7.8700 |
591.0 |
| 65 |
TB |
158.92400 |
8.2500 |
614.0 |
| 66 |
DY |
162.50000 |
8.5600 |
628.0 |
| 67 |
HO |
164.92999 |
8.8000 |
650.0 |
| 68 |
ER |
167.25999 |
9.0600 |
658.0 |
| 69 |
TM |
168.93401 |
9.3200 |
674.0 |
| 70 |
YB |
173.03999 |
6.9600 |
684.0 |
| 71 |
LU |
174.97000 |
9.8500 |
694.0 |
| 72 |
HF |
178.49001 |
11.4000 |
705.0 |
| 73 |
TA |
180.94800 |
16.6000 |
718.0 |
| 74 |
W |
183.85001 |
19.3000 |
727.0 |
| 75 |
RE |
186.20000 |
20.5300 |
736.0 |
| 76 |
OS |
190.20000 |
22.4800 |
746.0 |
| 77 |
IR |
192.20000 |
22.4200 |
757.0 |
| 78 |
PT |
195.08000 |
21.4500 |
790.0 |
| 79 |
AU |
196.98700 |
19.3000 |
790.0 |
| 80 |
HG |
200.59000 |
14.1900 |
800.0 |
| 81 |
TL |
204.37000 |
11.8500 |
810.0 |
| 82 |
PB |
207.19000 |
11.3400 |
823.0 |
| 83 |
BI |
208.98000 |
9.7800 |
823.0 |
| 84 |
PO |
210.00000 |
9.3000 |
830.0 |
| 85 |
AT |
210.00000 |
1.0000 |
825.0 |
| 86 |
RN |
222.00000 |
4.0000 |
794.0 |
| 87 |
FR |
223.00000 |
1.0000 |
827.0 |
| 88 |
RA |
226.00000 |
5.0000 |
826.0 |
| 89 |
AC |
227.00000 |
1.0000 |
841.0 |
| 90 |
TH |
232.03600 |
11.0000 |
847.0 |
| 91 |
PA |
231.00000 |
15.3700 |
878.0 |
| 92 |
U |
238.03000 |
18.9000 |
890.0 |
| 93 |
NP |
237.00000 |
20.5000 |
902.0 |
| 94 |
PU |
242.00000 |
19.7370 |
921.0 |
| 95 |
AM |
243.00000 |
11.7000 |
934.0 |
| 96 |
CM |
247.00000 |
7.0000 |
939.0 |
| 97 |
BK |
247.00000 |
1.0000 |
952.0 |
| 98 |
CF |
248.00000 |
1.0000 |
966.0 |
| 99 |
ES |
254.00000 |
1.0000 |
980.0 |
| 100 |
FM |
253.00000 |
1.0000 |
994.0 |
Next: Elastic scattering cross sections
Up: Simulation of electron transport
Previous: Two Photon Positron-Electron Annihilation
Contents
Index
Iwan Kawrakow
2009-07-10